• Home  
  • Apple TV Plus’ Mr. Scorsese docuseries is superb and revealing
- Magazine

Apple TV Plus’ Mr. Scorsese docuseries is superb and revealing

Out of all of the writers, directors, and producers who emerged from the late 1960s/early 1970s “New Hollywood” era, Martin Scorsese may have had the most ink spilled about his life and work. Prominent critics like Pauline Kael and Roger Ebert were singing Scorsese’s praises before anyone really knew who he was. And there have […]

Out of all of the writers, directors, and producers who emerged from the late 1960s/early 1970s “New Hollywood” era, Martin Scorsese may have had the most ink spilled about his life and work. Prominent critics like Pauline Kael and Roger Ebert were singing Scorsese’s praises before anyone really knew who he was. And there have been countless books that have touched on his career, such as Robert P. Kolker’s revelatory essay collection A Cinema Of Loneliness, Peter Biskind’s muckraking New Hollywood history Easy Riders, Raging Bulls, and Glenn Kenny’s incisive and entertaining making-of-Goodfellas tome Made Men.

The point is: If you have any interest at all in Scorsese, you probably already know the major plots of his story about as well as the good Catholic boy Scorsese knows the Stations Of The Cross. You know he was an asthmatic kid, stuck inside his Little Italy tenement building with his TV. You know his sensational NYU student films landed his name in the papers when he was still in his early twenties, that he worked on the landmark Woodstock documentary with his longtime editor/collaborator Thelma Schoonmaker, and that the exploitation film Boxcar Bertha that he made for producer Roger Corman garnered “don’t do this again” rebukes from his peers and mentors. You know how the fluorescent genius of Scorsese’s ’70s masterpieces led to a cocaine crash that almost killed him, how he struggled to get the work he most cared about made in the ’80s, and how his ’90s hits practically turned him into a brand.

With all of that said, what could director Rebecca Miller’s five-part Apple TV+ docuseries Mr. Scorsese possibly have to offer to anyone who knows this story backward and forward? Put simply: pictures—and more importantly: moving pictures. It’s one thing to read about how Scorsese designed the fight sequences in Raging Bull, varying the lighting, speed, and angles to make the audience feel as punch-drunk as the fighter. But it’s more enlightening to have Schoonmaker sit in front of a screen and walk us through those choices, while also showing us rarely seen outtakes that reveal how the movie’s individual shots were constructed. This series offers the Scorsese story illustrated, with Miller—an accomplished filmmaker herself—using split screens, clever edits, and footage from his personal archives to draw connections between the director’s films, his favorite movies, and his own experiences.

For the Scorsese faithful, the most revealing Mr. Scorsese chapter will likely be the first, “Stranger In A Strange Land.” The episode goes deep into his childhood, offering fresh details on how he grew up in a neighborhood (and a family) effectively controlled by the mob. This is a world Scorsese watched through his bedroom window. In one of this documentary’s most striking sequences, Miller pulls up image after image from Scorsese’s films of characters looking down at the action unfolding below them, close enough to be affected by it but still at a slight remove. It’s a unique perspective: the observer on the fringe of the fray, almost in range of any spatter.

There are still more treasures in “Stranger In A Strange Land,” including a look at the storyboards Scorsese sketched when he was a kid, making movies on paper before he had access to a camera. He was well-prepared by the time he arrived at film school, and while Scorsese’s student work has long been available for fans to watch, it looks different in the context of all the anecdotes about his youth. Here was this young man, underprivileged and largely self-taught, who came roaring out of the gate in his early twenties with some truly original and innovative shorts, fusing the experimentation of the French New Wave, the self-aware sophistication of Ealing comedies, and the invigorating danger of New York City.

The first episode ends with Scorsese feeling alienated and angry in California, where his friends Steven Spielberg, George Lucas, and Brian De Palma are all getting chances to make the movies they want to make while he’s wondering if he’ll have to follow up Boxcar Bertha with more low-budget, drive-in fodder. Then Miller throws in a cliffhanger of sorts, as Scorsese talks about wanting to do Mean Streets, needing a star, and being introduced to Robert De Niro.

Miller continues to follow this structure of building up to a turning point in Scorsese’s career and then cutting to the credits. Episode two, “All This Filming Isn’t Healthy,” covers the ’70s highs and lows, ending with him collapsing and being hospitalized while coping with the failure of New York, New York. Episode three, “Saint/Sinner,” begins with the triumph of Raging Bull and ends with the potentially career-ending controversy over The Last Temptation Of Christ. Episode four, “Total Cinema,” starts with the resounding resurrection of Goodfellas and finishes with a string of box-office disappointments, leaving Scorsese once again in need of a star to get his dream projects made. Enter Leonardo DiCaprio, who in episode five, “Method Director,” becomes Scorsese’s muse and angel.

Through each part, Miller and her interview subjects debunk a few myths about the man everyone calls Marty. There’s a version of the Scorsese story that suggests he’s gotten less passionate as he’s aged and that he’s compromised his vision sometimes for the sake of the deeper-pocketed financiers. But that’s not the story this documentary tells. Though its subject may have grown less temperamental over the past decade or so, Mr. Scorsese still draws a clear line between the man who battled with his personal demons and struggled with depression while making Raging Bull and The King Of Comedy and the one who fell into a similarly deep, dark hole while helming Shutter Island 30 years later.



Mr. Scorsese doesn’t shy away either from how an artist’s obsessiveness and fits of fury can hurt the people who try to love him. Miller interviews all three of Scorsese’s daughters (from three different wives), and each of them talks about what they’ve missed out on while he’s pursued his dreams. Only one of Scorsese’s ex-wives, Isabella Rossellini, sits for a new interview, and a strong memory she shares is of how, in the early ’80s, he seemed to start each day angry before he even got out of bed. Miller gets Scorsese to speak frankly about how his issues with women—conveyed with raw honesty in many of his films—stem from his strict Catholic upbringing and the contrasting role models of his big-hearted mother and severe father.

Yet many of Scorsese’s most valuable collaborators have been women—from Schoonmaker to some of his producers to the many actresses that he’s guided to Oscar nominations. These contradictions seem to animate Scorsese: the compassionate Christian obsessed with violence; the champion of independent cinema who demands nine-figure budgets for his own movies; and the man who kept driving away wives until he met and married his fifth, Helen Morris, who has been coping with Parkinson’s disease for decades. As the daughter of Arthur Miller and the wife of Daniel Day-Lewis, Miller surely has her own unique experience of living with geniuses; and it’s telling that she’s understanding yet not wholly forgiving of Scorsese’s weaknesses in this documentary.

Mr. Scorsese peters out toward the close of its final chapter, perhaps because it’s trying to put an end to a tale as yet unfinished. Scorsese is alive. Scorsese is still working. (Maybe someday we’ll get a sixth episode.) Nevertheless, this series is a valuable piece of cultural history and criticism, which serves to separate Martin Scorsese as an icon from who he really is as a human being and an artist. It’s easy to talk about Scorsese’s defining films in terms of their pervasive influence on cinema. But at its best, Miller’s documentary gets down into the nuts and bolts of the filmmaking itself, noting, for example, how Scorsese’s naturalistic dialogue has been influenced equally by On The Waterfront and Abbott and Costello, or how he framed the classic “funny how?” scene in Goodfellas so that the audience can see how increasingly uncomfortable the actors around Joe Pesci and Ray Liotta are becoming. 

And for all of its fine analysis, Mr. Scorsese also acknowledges that sometimes what the director has done remains ineffable. Early in “Saint/Sinner,” both Spielberg and De Palma talk with awe about the first time they saw Raging Bull, which is the work of an extraordinary filmmaker using all of his available tools in service of something that is equal parts brutal and personal, kinetic and suffocating. Spielberg says that the movie’s radical empathy for a violent man left him in a fugue state for hours, shaken to his core. As for the hyper-competitive De Palma, who has been hearing about the greatness of Scorsese since they were both NYC-based student filmmakers in the ’60s? He says he walked out of the theater muttering, “Oh my god, he’s done it again.”  


First Appeared on
Source link

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

isenews.com  @2024. All Rights Reserved.